American Revolution?
The Ron Paul legacy
Zach Germaniuk, Columnist
Issue date: 4/9/08 Section: News
|
Conservatives and Republicans disenchanted with George W. Bush's profligate spending and corporate coddling came to the Ron Paul camp because his laissez-faire economic platform was a welcome change from the state interventionism that has come to characterize many aspects of our economy. Liberals and Democrats watching the United States getting caught in another "nation-building" quagmire correctly recognized Paul's anti-war, pro-freedom stance as common sense. Independents of all stripes, from the fairly mainstream to the radical fringe, all found something to identify with in the Ron Paul campaign. Even a certain dread locked anarcho-capitalist found something inspiring in the man's campaign, as he watched Paul slam-dunk Rudy Giuliani on national television.
Then reality came and gave us all a swift kick. In the back of our heads we all knew that Paul was destined to be an also-ran, a compelling argument but ultimately a novelty in the world of 21st Century sound-byte politics. There are the true believers, of course, who have already canonized Paul as the patron-saint of everything right and good in America, the same people who, more often than by chance, find themselves on late-night chat rooms expressing their concern that AIDS is a biological weapon manufactured by the government.
Ron Paul's candidacy, much like that prom after party where you may or may not have lost a certain V card, isn't coming back. Rather than continuing to heap praise on the Texas Congressman, we should focus instead on the revolutionary foundations that Paul's campaign introduced to the nation. For an American political discourse that has become so dominated by voices of fear, war, and orange threat-levels, Ron Paul reminded a lot of people that this nation was not founded on these voices, but instead on the revolutionary proposition that individual freedom is worth more than any security the state could provide - the idea that governments are at best a necessary evil in order to better protect the freedom of its citizens.


Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 9
John Huckans
posted 4/09/08 @ 4:36 AM NA
Don't worry, this wasn't Trippi 2004. There was no Trippi helping RP's grassroots. In fact, had RP simply fired most of his campaign staff (and figured out a way for the grassroots to spend the $30M on their own projects), this story might have had a different ending. (Continued…)
Tom deSabla
posted 4/09/08 @ 4:38 AM NA
Well, here's the problem - government schools have ensured that the powerless young people have no idea what individual freedom really is nor do they realize that they don't really have it. (Continued…)
Baba Padmanabhan
posted 4/09/08 @ 5:47 AM NA
I don't understand why nobody wants to write about the blatant MSM black out of RP during the last 6 weeks leading up to Super Tuesday. I mean, nobody wants to question why Larry King Live was never aired the day before IOWA caucus? Nobody cares to find out why, 20/20 with John Stossl was never aired and why was he kept out of NH debate the weekend before NH Primary?
Media, how about researching and writing about your bias towards Dr. (Continued…)
Hugh Bodey
posted 4/09/08 @ 1:53 PM NA
Mr. Paul was NOT recognized by the media and the "powers that be" simply because he, and us, are not playing in the same ball game as they! The Trilateralists, bankers, big corporations, One Worlders, will not have an honest man like Mr. (Continued…)
Brian
posted 4/09/08 @ 3:18 PM NA
You wrote: . There are the true believers, of course, who have already canonized Paul as the patron-saint of everything right and good in America, the same people who, more often than by chance, find themselves on late-night chat rooms expressing their concern that AIDS is a biological weapon manufactured by the government. (Continued…)
RobTn4RonPaul
posted 4/09/08 @ 5:56 PM NA
Brian - Bump
Hillary Clinton's followers believe in little green men from Mars.
I love it.
Zach Germaniuk
posted 4/09/08 @ 10:27 PM NA
I refer you to the comments of Hugh Bodey.
reality check: in a nation of around 226 million people, 1 million supporters is pretty damn marginal. (Continued…)
Craig Harrington
posted 4/12/08 @ 1:06 AM NA
Zach, I know you well enough to pick you out of a lineup, we lived in Haverfield and Drackett, but I totally did not know that you were a Paulite... However, you should note that 226 million is slightly less than the population of Indonesia; the population of the United States is 300 million almost on the dot, so that 1 million strong is even MORE marginalized. (Continued…)
Post a Comment